From 418c2b3f09ce24fa6ff8fe587def3ce004fce2db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Coquand Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:10:38 -0600 Subject: Fix typo in curse of convenience --- posts/curse-of-convenience.njk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/posts/curse-of-convenience.njk b/posts/curse-of-convenience.njk index b15291a..c209c34 100644 --- a/posts/curse-of-convenience.njk +++ b/posts/curse-of-convenience.njk @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ understand? Yes, but at what cost? Even in tech literate circles, I see people seriously arguing that since LLMs learn like a human (false), LLMs should have the same fair use laws as us. These broken metaphors can end up having profound impacts of our lives. Seeing LLMs as -stochastic parrot vs sentient superhumans makes a huge difference for +stochastic parrots vs sentient superhumans makes a huge difference for how we want it regulated and how we interact with it.

This focus on convenience, ease-of-learning and ease-of-use, is in many ways a great leap forward in the way we build software. These days -- cgit v1.2.3